Stuff

Essentials

  • Activity

    September 2014
    S M T W T F S
    « Aug    
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    282930  
  • Categories

  • Thumbed Up Love

  • TC’s Beer Money Fund

  • Smokin’ Hot News

    BadBlue News Service

  • Teh Tweets!

  • Save the Puppies

    teh puppyblender
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog.

    Join 5 other subscribers

  • Remember

  • Archives

  • Meta

It’s Not About “Bitter.” It’s About the Man Saying What He Really Believes

Pajamas Media has an interesting story, Deep Inside ‘Bittergate’, that recounts how Zsa Zsa’s House of Preening Moonbats, who are totally in the tank for Barry, caused this story to explode.

Now, after watching the storm of coverage, lost in all the spin is something I found obvious. Ripping off MLK, I say judge Barry by the content of his character when trying to glean where his “understanding” of those small town folks comes from: twenty years in a pew at Pastor Wright’s church. Remember, when that bomb blew up Barry said this guy was who gave him his understanding of faith, so he could not possibly turn his back to the man who “brought him to Jesus.” So anytime Barry and “faith” are in the same sentence, whether in reference to his–or some Pennsy gun-toting, God fearing hillbillies–you really have to understand his working definition of what “faith” is….

There have only been two places where I have found anything that looked at this:

baldilocks:

If you think about it, the fact that Obama lumped the perceived religion of the white, rural Pennsylvanian with “antipathy toward those not like them”–that is, racism, bigotry and anti-immigration (sic)–makes perfect sense.* The latter is bad and so is the former—if one is observing from the perspective of Black Liberation Theology.

In Obama’s mind, the religion clung to by the “average poor white Pennsylvanian” is BLT’s demonic “white” Church. The “white” Church is the tool of oppression for all—including poor whites—and should be shaken off just like other social maladies. Just like anti-immigration (sic) and racism. One will note that, in the defense of the earlier remarks, Obama still does not say anything objectively positive about the religion adhered to by the average rural white Pennsylvanian. What he actually says is that government should answer their prayers.

Paxety Pages:

My concern is this: It’s not that “the other America” (black America) is just culturally different, but that it is fueled by racist hatred of whites. And when that embedded racism enters the political channel, I should not be expected to tolerate it. I will not have my rights as a citizen abrogated by anyone. Nor should any other American (black, white, or whatever). Barack Obama is a product of this alternate America, this anti-American, anti-white black liberation theology. Black Liberation Theology (1966) was spawned by Afrocentrism – a ludicrous reinvention of history that has the Egyptians as black Africans who flew around the skies of North Africa on wings, a black Jesus, and every major player in history, except perhaps George Washington, as being of sub-Sharan origin.

Revered Wright subscribes to BLT; and his disciple, the presidential candidate formerly known as Barry Obama, sat at his feet for twenty years soaking it up. Barack’s negative feelings about whites are a matter of public record . . . scribed by his own hand. There is nothing in his early policy statements to suggest at some point he suddenly had an epiphany that white people weren’t the devil incarnate.

Today, Bob Herbert in the NY Times (via Cap’n Ed) said Barry’s various explanations avoided stating the “obvious”:

Bob Herbert joins the vast majority of punditry in scolding Barack Obama over his comments in San Francisco about small-town Midwestern voters. Before readers get their hopes up about Herbert suddenly discovering common sense, they should note that Herbert thinks Obama failed to go far enough. He writes that Obama should have explicitly called them racists:

Print Friendly
 
  

There are 3 Comments to "It’s Not About “Bitter.” It’s About the Man Saying What He Really Believes"

  • hashfanatic says:

    “….Bob Herbert….”

    Radical chic. Just another form of decadence.

    Just another pseudo-intellectual form of those “X” caps on sale everywhere during another time and place. Like “Crooklyn.”

    But Bob Herbert can’t help his own people navigate day-to-day life.

    Why would any of us think he could help us navigate anything?

    He’s not always wrong, but he’s wrong more often than he’s right, IMHO.

  • hashfanatic says:

    “Zsa Zsa’s House Of Preening Moonbats”…”totally in the tank for Obama”..

    Interesting. Many in the “Hitler Youth For Bambi” extremist asylum are thoroughly convinced HuffPo’s a Hillary sleeper cell (most likely due to Arianna’s relationship with Mark Green).

  • TC says:

    Bob Herbert is so predictable that a couple years back Evan Coyne Maloney whipped up a piece of coding called Automatic Bob, that hacked out columns that could easily pass for the dreck Herbert regurgitated regularly back in those days.

    As for Zsa-Zsa’s bunch, if you go to the article that started the ball rolling, and related ones in the aftermath, an overwhelming majority of the commenters (excuse me, “community”) are convinced the author is a Hillary plant who managed to fool everyone–Zsa Zsa, her co-founder/managing partner, and “OffTheBus” editor Marc Cooper… but they all see right through her! Clinton’s camp “described the Huffington Post as “a conveyor belt” for material that is pro-Obama and anti-Hillary” in the Pajamas Media story.

    The fact is that in the piece the damning quotes were buried deep in the story, but still those stupid HuffPo assholes couldn’t recognize just how truly incendiary those words were… probably because they saw nothing wrong with them, since they likely aligned with their own view of what makes “those people” tick.

Other Stuff

Search

Enhanced by true google 404 wordpress plugin