Comments on: Hitch Smacks CAIR Mouthpiece Silly Discussing the Pace Case

By: TC

TC — Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:16:06 +0000

Gotta agree with Mayor Eddie; Prager certainly sounds like a shmuck, especially the part of his response where he said, “Two years ago the American Jewish Press Association awarded me its Prize for Excellence in Commentary. Did they miss something that Ed Koch caught? Or does he smear people he differs with as part of his style of argumentation?”

Dude, fuck you! No one gives a shit about your award from two years’ previously written commentary. What you said was retarded. What if an avowed atheist gets elected? What good would that oath be worth being sworn on a book the person thinks is work of fiction?

By: hashfanatic

hashfanatic — Thu, 02 Aug 2007 00:50:55 +0000

(I’m kind of perplexed by Prager; ….. he comes off as a fairly temperate guy… he’s not a firebreather… why does he draw such vitriol?)

Ed Koch seems to disagree:

http://www.forward.com/articles/koch-calls-for-pundits-ouster-from-shoah-council/

By: hashfanatic

hashfanatic — Thu, 02 Aug 2007 00:43:49 +0000

What voltage are YOU on, shockcorridor?

Might I suggest powering on to MAX HEADROOM, on the double?

By: MajorDad1984

MajorDad1984 — Thu, 02 Aug 2007 00:38:44 +0000

Shock…I think that many of us here take issue with most of what Hash has to say.

I do have to applaud his tenacity to keep coming back for more. Let’s just say that between TC, Drake and I we’re his Apollo Creed, Clubber Lang and Ivan Drago. Son of a bitch, the boy can take his lumps. Gotta admire that in him.

See you on the high ground!

MajorDad1984

By: shockcorridor

shockcorridor — Wed, 01 Aug 2007 23:33:55 +0000

Just kind of wandered over here through a trackback. Nice site TC. I notice you go back and forth with “hashfanatic” a lot.
I stumbled upon this gem from hash:
“Putin is a leader who at least looks out for his own people’s interests.”
That pretty much was game set match there. Hash, you are a clueless douche. Smoke up, tool.

By: hashfanatic

hashfanatic — Wed, 01 Aug 2007 21:16:44 +0000

I’m not asking to “set rules”.

I’m asking you to have some consideration for your guests, and be upfront if you want to amend your own comments and opinions with these little signing statements.

By: TC

TC — Wed, 01 Aug 2007 20:06:56 +0000

“Oh, I’m sorry. I’d been led to believe by your comments here and on “the “Tranquilizer” that finances were not a concern.”

They’re not, but unless you got money on the table, you don’t get to set the rules for the game.

By: hashfanatic

hashfanatic — Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:23:16 +0000

#13: If you know the date, why not gimme the link? This is a “Web 101” question, hashfanatic; do you know how to do anything other than hit “say it”?

I honestly don’t know why I linked it.

I also don’t know why (like on so many other occasions) you seem unable to address the issue at all, much less honestly.

By: hashfanatic

hashfanatic — Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:21:33 +0000

“#9: I LOL like a lolcat on a Caturday morning.”

Or a good soldier, locked into a tight corner?

“#10: Don’t be a dick and think you can make fucking rules that please you until you send me a check to help cover my bandwidth.”

Oh, I’m sorry. I’d been led to believe by your comments here and on “the “Tranquilizer” that finances were not a concern. I guess the best time to spray graffiti is to wait until the lights go out…

“#11: No, that was pulled from the San Francisco Chronicle.”

Reporting on the administration’s second revision of official events.

“And the “shirt laundress” crap marks you a bigot hack who can’t argue facts, but has an MBA in the “politics of personal destruction.””

Uh-huh. Like every single post of yours is brimming over with love, hope, and actual solutions for the problems of the Western World, prosperity for all, and the gorgeous mosaic of diversity that is this great nation.

By: TC

TC — Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:07:52 +0000

#9: I LOL like a lolcat on a Caturday morning.

#10: Don’t be a dick and think you can make fucking rules that please you until you send me a check to help cover my bandwidth.

#11: No, that was pulled from the San Francisco Chronicle.

#12: “One time” was enough to get my point across. And the “shirt laundress” crap marks you a bigot hack who can’t argue facts, but has an MBA in the “politics of personal destruction.”

#13: If you know the date, why not gimme the link? This is a “Web 101″ question, hashfanatic; do you know how to do anything other than hit “say it”?

By: hashfanatic

hashfanatic — Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:07:33 +0000

“TC: refresh my memory. Since there is a search box atop this page, and you couldn’t point me at your effort to “comply,” (and I really don’t give a shit about most of this unless I’m looking at it) I truly have no idea what you are getting at.”

On 7/21/07, I mentioned Bush’s executive order targeting the money and property of dissidents, and you demanded its number. I provided it, quoted a portion of it, and then I heard the usual serenade of crickets.

Guess you must have been too busy.

By: hashfanatic

hashfanatic — Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:02:30 +0000

“Hell, I’ve told Malkin to fuck off right here in my archives if you’d spend a moment looking around.”

Yeah, one time.

Also, wasn’t it you that asserted that you considered “Hot Air” to be Allahpundit’s baby, and not the shirt laundress herself?

By: hashfanatic

hashfanatic — Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:00:08 +0000

“I did find a credible source that put Tillman in Iraq; it also told me the idea that his own men fragged him on orders from BushCheneyHilterCo kinda in a dustbin:”

That was from Version Number Two….the “friendly fire” tale the administration tried to float….

TC? Cover-ups in the military DO exist…..

You’re not getting that it’s the cover-ups that are the real issue.

By: hashfanatic

hashfanatic — Wed, 01 Aug 2007 13:55:21 +0000

“TC: Hash, they DENIED having any contact with CAIR in this imbroglio. It’s a flatline lie.”

(Please stop inserting your follow-up comments into old ones from commenters. All this serves is to ensure that they do not show up in the comments bar on the right (and guarantees that they will not be seen or responded to. It’s just dishonest.)

And they may well have not. The school is not obligated to share every official contact on every incident that they have regarding school business.

What I got from reading the reports was that they had had prior contact with CAIR regarding the previous incidents, and what exactly is the big deal about that? Interest groups that purport to defend Muslim interests are not exactly permitted to thrive and flourish in the current environment and it would be natural and normal for the university to consult the one that was the most prominent and well-known, no?

[TC: "(Please stop inserting your follow-up comments into old ones from commenters. All this serves is to ensure that they do not show up in the comments bar on the right (and guarantees that they will not be seen or responded to. It's just dishonest.)"

Tuff titties. It's my bar; my whims and predacious predilictions have absolute moral authority.

Ergo, I do whatever the fuck I wanna do.]